Verlenging naturalisatietermijnen

Reactie

Naam Mr S Devarasu
Plaats Almere
Datum 2 oktober 2025

Vraag1

U kunt op de gehele regeling en memorie van toelichting reageren.
I respectfully object to the proposal to extend the naturalisation period from 5 to 10 years. I strongly support keeping the current 5-year pathway to Dutch citizenship.

The 5-year term has proven to be effective, fair, and beneficial for both the Netherlands and newcomers. Extending it to 10 years would delay the positive effects that naturalisation brings, both for individuals and for Dutch society as a whole.

Why the 5-year pathway is stronger and better for the Netherlands:

1. Encourages Integration and Participation
Citizenship motivates people to learn Dutch faster, participate in civic life, and build stronger connections in their communities. A shorter pathway makes people feel truly at home sooner, strengthening social cohesion.


2. Boosts Economic Contribution
Citizens are more likely to invest in long-term careers, start businesses, buy homes, and contribute consistently to the tax system. Delaying citizenship delays these economic benefits for the country.


3. Supports Stability and Security
A 5-year rule provides stability to families and individuals who are already integrated and contributing. It reduces uncertainty and prevents the feeling of being “temporary,” which can otherwise discourage people from fully investing in their future in the Netherlands.


4. Strengthens Democracy
Citizenship gives people the right to vote and participate in shaping the future of the Netherlands. Enabling committed residents to join the democratic process after 5 years creates a more representative and inclusive society.


5. Keeps the Netherlands Attractive for Skilled Talent
A fair and achievable pathway helps the Netherlands remain competitive in attracting international talent, students, and workers who enrich the economy and society.



For these reasons, the current 5-year pathway strikes the right balance between integration and inclusion. Extending the period to 10 years risks undermining these benefits, delaying contributions, and creating unnecessary barriers to belonging.

I therefore urge you to keep the naturalisation period at 5 years.