Verlenging naturalisatietermijnen

Reactie

Naam Anoniem
Plaats Delft
Datum 15 oktober 2025

Vraag1

U kunt op de gehele regeling en memorie van toelichting reageren.
As a highly skilled migrant (HSM) working and living in the Netherlands, I am deeply concerned about the proposed extension of the naturalization period from 5 to 10 years. My wife and I are both engineers, actively contributing to the Dutch economy and society through our professional expertise.

We also have two children who are thriving in the Dutch education system and are fluent in the language. For example, our daughter recently transitioned to secondary school with an excellent recommendation from her primary school and is now enrolled in a VWO class — a clear reflection of her integration and potential. Our family has embraced life in the Netherlands and invested in building a future here.

However, this proposed change introduces significant uncertainty about our long-term prospects. Despite our deep commitment to the country, we now find ourselves reconsidering our presence and exploring alternative options. Citizenship which means permanent residency is not just a legal formality — it represents belonging, stability, and a shared future. Extending the waiting period risks alienating families like ours who are already deeply embedded in Dutch society.

If the Netherlands aims to remain competitive in attracting and retaining global talent, it must also offer a fair and timely path to citizenship/permanent residency. I urge policymakers to consider the broader impact this change will have on integration, innovation, and the country’s reputation as a welcoming destination for skilled professionals and their families.

Extending the period to 10 years for everyone, regardless of their contribution or status, may discourage skilled professionals and long-term residents who already play an active role in the Dutch economy and community. A fair and balanced approach would be to assess individuals based on merit, compliance, and contribution rather than increasing the waiting period universally.

Best Regards,